CancerEntelev®/ Cancell™/
Cantron
Conspiracy or Just Common Rationalizations?
The FDA harassed
the developer James Sheridan and prevented labs from
testing his compound. Eventually they placed an
injunction against him from distributing Cancell™ even
though no one had reported any adverse side effects.
It is not likely that
any doctor knowingly suppresses a cancer cure to
protect their business or career. But, every doctor
has his or her own ideas about the best treatment based
on what they have learned. However, the
pharmaceutical companies have an extremely strong
influence over what medical doctors are taught.
Doctors are too busy to dig into the statistics of
cancer treatments, they assume that what they are
taught in school is the best treatments. They cannot
afford to suspect that these treatments are only the
best for the pharmaceutical companies that influence
their institutions of "higher learning."
Considering Chemo?
From the 12th
December 2002 issue of Journal of the American
Medical Association, in a review with James Spencer
Malpas, M.D., D.Phil. St. Bartholomew's Hospital
London, United Kingdom:
"a recent randomized trial of treatment for
stage one multiple myeloma by Riccardi and colleagues
(British Journal of Cancer 2000;82:1254-60) showed no
advantage of conventional chemotherapy over no
treatment.
The above statement is
in direct contrast to popular belief because of
statements like this:
"1998 was
truly one of the most exciting years for cancer
research," said Harmon Eyre, MD, executive
vice president for research and medical affairs
for the American Cancer Society (ACS).
"While we are closer than ever to finding
answers..." followed by a pitch for more
donations.
Who is telling
the truth?
In 1984 an unusual convention of doctors was
held in Chicago. Nine eminent physicians from all
over the United States spoke to an auditorium packed
with their colleagues. The name of the conference was
Dissenant in Medicine. The theme at the conference
was the propensity of the nation's medical hierarchy
to lie to the public. Among the speakers was Alan S.
Leaven, M.D., professor of immunology at the
University of California, San Francisco, Medical
School, "Practicing physicians are intimidated
into using regimes which they know do not work. One
of the most glaring examples is chemotherapy, which
does not work for the majority of cancers."
If you want to learn
what a doctor would discover if they researched the
statistics of their cancer treatments, here are ten
pages reprinted from the book World Without Cancer
which address surgery,
radiation, and chemo effectiveness. These pages are preceded
by my introduction which summarizes the cancer
mechanism presented by the book. So many facts are
presented in the book that no doubt remains that this
mechanism is accurate. Two obvious conclusions
arise: here is another safe, effective cancer
treatment and a simple pill-a-day
preventative. Unfortunately, the pharmaceutical
companies in concert with the AMA were able to
discredit this treatment, despite successful test
results, exactly like NCI did with their test result
summary concerning Cancell™.
The
"War" on Cancer or, How to Make a Lot
of Money Forever
Summarizing
the first 20 years of the war on drugs (during which
time our taxes have poured into the medical industry
at $billions each year for cancer research alone) the
American Cancer Society (Cancer Facts and Figures
1997 web page, see Links at the page bottom) presents
a table showing the percentage of people who die of
cancer each year by cancer type. The percentage has
risen in more than half the 43 types of cancers
studied. The overall percentage of people dying
of cancer increased. You might think that this has to
do with having a larger older population, but read
on:
Regarding conventional
treatments, Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D. formerly of
Sloan-Kettering Cancer center, from his Cancer
Chronicles #20 ©March 1994 by :
"It's
official. Even the Journal of the American
Medical Association now admits that the war on
cancer is a failure. An article in the Feb. 9
[1994] issue says that cancer incidence and death
rates are rising. Most people knew that
smoking-related cancers were on the rise. Now we
learn that a "baby boomer's" chances of
getting non-smoking-related cancers are double
what their grandparent's odds were. "In
all age groups, cancer incidence is
increasing...," the article reveals.
In addition,
"few new, effective treatments have been
devised for the most common cancers." This
follows similar revelations in Scientific
American (2/94)."
Despite the number of
people who quit smoking, the percentage for deaths
due to lung cancer has increased dramatically.
Something is basically wrong with conventional wisdom
regarding cancer. On the other hand alternative
treatments are working exactly the way they should,
but doctors continue to attack their effectiveness.
How
Alternative Treatments are Successfully Attacked
Alternative
treatments usually treat the cause of an illness, but
each illness can have a number of causes. Therefore,
each alternative cancer treatment is effective on a
smaller percentage* of cases than something like
chemo which works on the symptoms. Chemo will often
reduce the size of tumors, but they start growing
again because chemo does not addressing the cause of
the cancer. The good news is that you can try a
number of alternative treatments at the same time.
This is a tremendous advantage over chemo which make
it almost impossible for any other treatment to work
because of the destruction of the immune system among
other things.
* This is not true of
Cancell™ which works directly on Cancer cells not on
the cause of the cancer and therefore has a higher
effectively than most alternatives. For this reason,
using Laetrile which does work on a Cancer cause it
an excellent combination and does not interfere with
each other.
What Chemo
Does
Chemo
kills. It killed my sister who died of pneumonia
after chemo destroyed her immune system. Renal
failure has killed many others after chemo destroyed
their kidneys. There are so many accusations about
the abuses inherent with conventional cancer
treatment that no less than eight books have explored
"the cancer conspiracy." See
Links.
Why Doctors Don't Prescribe Cancell™
Any treatment that you
can obtain and self-administer threatens to remove
your doctor from their treatment program. Although
your doctor may not object to this, the American
Medical Association (AMA) is strongly opposed to such
a trend. For this reason the AMA has pushed for
legislation to prevent the public from ever being
exposed to alternatives. They have succeeded:
From
the Office of Technology Assessment United
States Congress, Archive of 1990, "Because
their practices fall outside of standard medical
practice, physicians who offer unconventional
cancer treatments are vulnerable to the civil
charge of malpractice."
From Dr. Moss's book,
Questioning Chemotherapy (see
Links) the estimated worldwide sales of all
anti-cancer agents for 1997 is $11 billion. This
includes cytotoxics and hormone treatments;
cytokines; and anti-emetics. Cytotoxics (harmful
compounds like chemo) represent about two-thirds of
the market or about $7 billion.
If you operated a drug
company and had a well known product that doctors
were always prescribing, wouldn'tt you do all
you could to promote your product and prevent
competitive products from being used? What kind of
promotion does a $7 billion a year product inspire?
Drug companies have
the ear of most doctors. Mean while, Sheridan can't
even get acknowledged by the medical community
because he isn't a medical doctor.
Back -
Next
This
information was provided by; Paul
Winter. Please
contact him for purchase information
|