Home Page
 Articles & Reviews
 Animal Health
 Ayurveda
 Books
 Common Diseases
 Diet & Nutrition
 Drugs
 Features
 Healing
 Health Practitioners
 Herbs
 Massage
 Men
 Minerals
 Poisons
 Product Reviews
 Product
  Manufacturers
 Psychology
 Skin Care
 Sleep
 Spiritual Healing
 Tantra
 Tarot
 Vitamins
 Wisdom
 Women

 Membership
 Write to Us
 Advertise Here

 Links
  Business Directory
  Dating
  Holistic Bodywork
  Humour
  Learn Massage
  New Zealand Gift Ideas
  Shopping
  Travel

The Hotel
Discounter
Book Your Beds
Now

American Cancer Society (ACS)
From the web site of the ACS, “Cancell™ is composed of common chemicals, including nitric acid, sodium sulfite, potassium hydroxide, sulfuric acid, and catechol. The FDA found no basis for proponent claims of Cancell™'s effectiveness against cancer.” This is a true statement only because the FDA never tested Cancell™. They did try to determine which component of Cancell™ acts to destroy cancer cells which only demonstrates that they didn't understand how Cancell™ operated - they didn't listen to the man who developed Cancell™. Although the formula of Cancell™ has changed slightly over the years, it contains: inositol, potassium, sodium, copper, and a bioflavonoids complex. These ingredients are clearly listed on the label.

Randolph F. Wykoff, MD
Randolph F. Wykoff, MD Randolph F. Wykoff MD, an Associate Commissioner in FDA states, “Cancell™ is water that has been ‘energized’ by a plant. It has been promoted to have a high cure rate for all types of cancer, plus diabetes, arthritis, lupus, and, more recently, AIDS. Several studies were attempted to evaluate the product. However, none showed any therapeutic benefit.” Apparently DR. Wykoff hasn’t looked at the NCI test results and failed to read the above statement made by the ACS regarding the components of Cancell™. Admittedly “energized” water was distributed by Ed Sopcak for a short time under the name Cancell™. When Ed changed the product, he should have changed the name. Anyone like DR. Wykoff, who criticizes an important cancer treatment should look close enough to uncover such a basic facts. Here is another medical doctor who has incorrect information and he thinks his information is good enough to spread around the world. You may have a great doctor, but you can't trust the sources of information that he or she is exposed to.

Actual NCI Test Results
Three sets of test results were requested from the National Cancer Institute (NCI):

1. Test results for Cancell™.

2. Test results for any compound that was not considered worthy of further study. NCI sent test results for perilly alcohol.

3. Test results for a compound considered worthy of further study. NCI sent test results for taxol.

Test Procedure
NCI initial, in-vitro different testing of compounds for anti-tumor activity applies five concentrations of the masses of each of compound under test to five human tumor 60 After a fixed number of different tumor types (5 x 60 =300 tumor masses). days, NCI tumors. A reduction in mass is measures the change in mass of all 300 indicated number and indicates anti-cancer by a negative percentage growth activity.

Summarizing the Test Results
With 300 tumor masses to track, the test data becomes cumbersome. Therefore, two criterion were developed to summarize the results:

80% hits - the number of tumor types out of the 60 tested that showed 80% or greater reduction in mass.
95% hits - the number of tumor types out of the 60 tested that showed 95% or greater reduction in mass.

Concentration levels are very significant for compounds like Chemo because Chemo is so toxic. However, Cancell™ is many times less  toxic than aspirin. Therefore, for simplicity, all concentrations were lumped together; if any concentration showed a reduction greater than 80% or 95%, it is a hit. This puts toxic compounds like Chemo in a much better light than they deserve, but even so, Cancell™ demonstrates superior performance in the NCI screening test.

Table 1. Summary of  Test Results From NCI

*The total of 80% hits includes all mass reductions of 80% or greater; this includes mass reductions of 95% .

Table 1 clearly shows that Cancell™ is more active than a popular chemotherapeutic agent NCI judged to be active, taxol, but NCI still judged Cancell™ inactive. Click here to view more data from the test results or download the actual test result sheets. Furthermore, the tests are designed for fast acting compounds like Chemo; Cancell™ works more slowly. The developer, James Sheridan, felt that Cancell™ would have completely eliminated the tumor masses if the test was conducted for a longer period.

Back - Next

This information was provided by; Paul Winter. Please contact him for purchase information

Ad Writers Wanted
Write Your Own Income
A Business in A Box